Author
The Cyprus Medical Association, the Vienna/Austrian Medical Chambers and the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health.
International
Publisher:
The Cyprus Medical Association, the Vienna/Austrian Medical Chambers and the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health.
Published: November 2017
on EMF:data since 27.03.2018
Page number: 4
Format: A4
Appeal

Nicosia Declaration on Electromagnetic Fields / Radiofrequencies.

Press release

The Cyprus Medical Association, the Vienna/Austrian Medical Chambers and the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health (NCECH) during the scientific event  on 11th  of November 2017 “The impact of non-ionization radiation on health: A Myth or an emerging medical challenge? Signed the Nicosia Declaration  on EMF/RF (attached)
 
The event was under the auspices of his excellency the Minister of Health Dr George Pamborides and the Commissioner for the Environment Mrs Ioanna Panayiotou   The Minister of Health in his greeting expressed his support and in particular to the activities of the NCECH and said  that investments on Children’s Health are of utmost importance. He welcomed the cooperation established by the three organizations from Cyprus and Austria. He said that the Declaration is an important development with specific and quite important targets. Referring to the issue of EMF/RF he mentioned that it is a potential carcinogen 2b and concluded saying that Prevention is the only choice.  
 
The President of the Cyprus Medical Association Dr Petros Agathangelou highlighted that the Council of Europe, the European Parliament, Medical Associations and many other scientists warned that despite scientific controversies the scientific evidence of serious health impacts due to the exponentially growing exposure to, among others, a potential carcinogen radiation (IARC 2011), is strong enough. We must apply the Precautionary Principle, the legal limits need to be urgently revised, professionals, decision makers and the public need to be adequately informed about potential health impact and new technologies must  be adequately controled for their potential  health impact. Finally, he stressed, that it is urgent to minimize the exposure.

The President of NCECH Dr Stella Canna Michaelidou highlighted that the realistic approach proposed in the Declaration, combined with adequate awareness raising and education, defines and promotes a framework  for rational and safe technology utilization. Technology should be used as a tool and not as a substitute to human relations and in particular of adequate substantial education and relationships with our children.
 
Dr Lercher from the Vienna/Austrian Medical Association convened the greetings from the President Prof. Dr. Thomas Szekeres. He stressed that our children are our future and characterised this event and the signed Declaration, as having the potential to raise a world wild strong awareness effect.
 
The signing of the Nicosia Declaration is a milestone of international importance and very significant for Cyprus, which is contributing substantially to international efforts for understanding potential health impacts from EMF/RF, raising awareness  and most importantly in taking effective measures to minimize the risks of the developing technology. The Common Position Paper specifies scientifically evidence based positions and recommendations  in how to deal with this serious and  complicated Health issue. An issue  with wide range implications because of serious risks affecting in particular all children,  the new generations but also the entire population.
 
The main issues raised in the  Declaration are :
Potential health Impacts of non ionizing radiation from EMF/RF include carcinogenicity (class  2b IARC 2011), developmental neurotoxicity, effects on DNA, on fertility, hypersensitivity and other serious effects are well documented in peer reviewed studies and occurring at extremely lower levels than existing limits. The fact that fetuses and children have delicate systems that direct the development of human life is reaffirmed. Despite scientific controversies substantial scientific evidence of risks for fetuses and children does exist, indicating damages that could be serious and in some cases irreversible. This evidence is strong enough to support precautionary actions and to establish activities and rules for minimizing exposure as well as careful technology handling. These concerns and the emerging risks were further confirmed from the scientific presentations made by the eminent speakers, Prof. Olle Johanson, Dr Piero Lercher, Dr Antigoni Papavasileiou, Dr Theodoros Metsis and Dr Stella Canna Michaelidou
 
Abstract of the main suggestions made:
1. At the Policy level guidelines and regulatory standards need to be revised. In the meantime existing science based and biological relevant criteria must be applied to evaluate children’s exposure from devices or infrastructures.  2.  Decision makers especially in Education and the Health Sector need to be aware of risks and the existing safe alternatives of the Technology, must consider adequately Health concerns, children’s vulnerability and support safe environments in schools, day-care and  paediatric units. They must promote age related rational application of digital technology. Wireless Networks should be prohibited in schools, particularly in preschools, kindergartens and elementary schools, where wired connections should be adopted. We ask them to follow the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle and the Council of Europe Resolution 1815 to take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to RFR 3. Exposure at home and schools (where children depending on their age spend at least 6090% of their time) can and must be reduced by minimising the use of mobile phones and other wireless devices.   4. Medical professionals, especially paediatricians and obstetricians should be adequately educated  5. The public have the right to be fully informed about potential health risks from all wireless and EMF transmitting devices/infrastructures and educated on risk reduction strategies. Parents need to be empowered to demand a safe environment at home and schools. 

Sixteen Practical rules are proposed, for the public